A NO-DEAL Brexit could cost the UK car industry up to £70 million a day, according to a new report.
The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) has warned that a hard exit from the EU could deliver a "knockout blow" to the sector's ability to compete.
The trade body's 2019 UK Automotive Trade Report calculates that delays to production caused by an end to frictionless trade could add up to £50,000 a minute - amounting to £70m a day in a worst-case scenario.
It also says World Trade Organisation tariffs would amount to £4.5 billion a year for trade in passenger cars alone.
SMMT chief executive Mike Hawes said: "From an industry point of view, the prospect of a no-deal would be catastrophic."
He insisted the report is not part of "Project Fear", adding: "We have tried to take a reasoned, fact-based approach."
Mr Hawes warned that the industry faces "death by 1,000 cuts", where a gradual erosion of competitiveness makes it harder to invest.
The SMMT said without the automotive industry the UK would lose its status as the world's 10th biggest exporter of goods, falling to 14th place behind Belgium, Canada, Mexico and Russia.
It is calling for the next prime minister to make securing a good Brexit deal his number one priority.
"We need a deal. No deal is not an option," said Mr Hawes.
Addressing business leaders and politicians at the industry's annual conference in London, he added: "Automotive matters to UK trade and to the economy, and this report shows that, if the right choices are made, a bright future is possible.
"However, no deal remains the clear and present danger.
"We are already seeing the consequences of uncertainty, the fear of no-deal.
"The next PM's first job in office must be to secure a deal that maintains frictionless trade because, for our industry, no deal is not an option and we don't have the luxury of time."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here