First-half profits at Santander's UK business plunged by more than a third as the mortgage price war dragged down its income.
The Spanish-owned lender saw its profits continue to be weighed down by intense pressure in the UK mortgage market, which saw it post a 35 per cent profit slump in the first quarter.
The UK business was also pressurised by restructuring costs after the group announced earlier this year that it is to axe 140 branches across the UK, putting more than 1,200 jobs at risk.
UK pre-tax profits fell by 36% to £575 million in the half-year to June as the intense competition over mortgages pulled down income for the period.
READ MORE: Santander profits tumble as Brexit uncertainty and overhaul costs weigh
Income slipped by 8.4% to £2.1 billion during the half-year, but the company held firm on its outlook for the rest of 2019.
It said that, assuming the UK has an orderly exit from the EU, its forecasts remain unchanged, although it said it has continued no-deal Brexit preparations as that potential outcome becomes more likely.
Santander spent £113m on its UK restructuring programme in the year to date, and said it expects to spend around £400m on strategy changes by the end of 2021.
The bank's global business saw earnings fall by 18% in the second quarter, due to the impact of restructuring surrounding its acquisition of troubled lender Banco Popular and the muted performance in the UK.
READ MORE: Santander slashing UK costs amid group drive to save £1bn
Ahead of the looming August deadline for PPI claims, Santander said that it had a remaining provision of £248m to redress PPI-related costs.
Nathan Bostock, chief executive, said: "The results for the first half of the year reflect the start of a multi-year investment in our strategic transformation programme, a number of external factors and our prudent approach to risk.
"Our business remains strong, with the further enhancement of our mortgage franchise and increases in our retail and corporate deposits, both important customer loyalty drivers.
"These are uncertain times, and our profitability has been impacted by a fall in income due to the highly competitive UK mortgage market."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article