WETHERSPOON boss Tim Martin has launched a scathing attack on corporate governance rules and advisers which he said are causing companies to collapse.
The ardent pro-Brexit businessman also said he believed a no-deal Brexit would be preferable to the current deal secured by Prime Minister Boris Johnson.
In a long update to the stock market, Mr Martin then hit out at one of the company's biggest shareholders for voting against two board members at the pub chain's annual general meeting last year.
On trading, Wetherspoon revealed sales were up 5.3% in the 13 weeks to October 27 on a like-for-like basis, with one pub opened and four shut. The company aims to open between 10 and 15 pubs in the current financial year.
Bosses have also spent £43.3 million on buying freeholds of pubs where Wetherspoon was previously a tenant, and a further £6.4m went on the company buying its own shares in an attempt to boost the price.
But Mr Martin used the update to express his anger at new rules that say non-executives should only serve on boards for a maximum of nine years.
Non-executives are supposed to be impartial and regulators believe there is a risk to their independence if they stay longer.
He said: "There can be little doubt that the current system has directly led to the failure or chronic underperformance of many businesses, including banks, supermarkets and pubs.
"I believe by vesting so much power in non-executive directors (NEDs), the system is also disenfranchising executives and the workforce - the people who have real expertise and are the cornerstone of business success.
"Another tectonic fault is that the institutions and advisers which oversee the code, as described below, do not themselves adhere to the rules they impose on others."
He went on to attack companies that do not have employee representatives and more management on boards - Wetherspoons has a board of five executives and three non-executives - and complained that non-executives do not have enough experience.
"It is also common practice for there to be only two executive directors, the most senior of whom, the CEO, averages only about five years - managements and workers are thus absurdly under-represented.
"A cursory glance at the board compositions of major UK PLCs underlines the issues.
"Tesco, for example, which has 450,000 employees and is the UK's largest supermarket group, has only two executive directors, with total service of about nine years, and 11 NEDs with total service of 38 years. The overall average, including NEDs and executives, is only 3.7 years.
"This sort of corporate structure is mirrored in banks, retailers and pubs - where long-term performance, over recent decades, has usually veered between poor and catastrophic."
HSBC, RBS, Barclays and Lloyds were also singled out for having no non-executives with any personal experience of the financial crash in 2008.
Attacks were also made on Wetherspoon' largest institutional investor, Columbia Threadneedle, over its decision to not support the re-election of two non-executives at last year's annual general meeting.
"As a result, three of our four NEDs felt compelled to offer their resignations - inevitably destabilising the company in the process," he added.
But Mr Martin's strongest criticism was against corporate governance advisory group Pirc, which recommends to institutional investors how best to vote at annual general meetings.
Pirc has recommended investors vote against Wetherspoon's pay report over the company's £95,000 spend on Brexit-related beer mats, suggesting the company may have breached political spending rules.
Mr Martin said: "Amazingly, while advising Wetherspoon that it should have four or five 'independent' NEDS, the hypocritical Pirc has, itself, just one on its own board - someone whose only apparent employment experience has been at a local authority."
On Brexit, Mr Martin said: "I strongly believe that the UK economy will be better off on the basis of no deal rather than the deal proposed by the Government."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here