THE boss of Lloyds Bank is set to give up half his annual pension allowance after staff and shareholders expressed outrage at the gap between his pension and those of other Lloyds employees.
The bank is consulting with shareholders on slashing Antonio Horta-Osorio's pension by almost £230,000, to bring it in line with others at the company.
Mr Horta-Osorio, who joined Lloyds from Santander in 2011, has been criticised by shareholders and staff for his pension. The chief executive can get up to 33% of his basic salary as a pension, compared with an average of 13% at the bank.
He already took a cut from 46% in the company's last annual report as the bank tries to get in line with Investment Association (IA) guidelines. Now the bank is discussing whether to slash that further to 15%. The story was first reported by the Financial Times.
Lloyds bosses have also asked shareholders what they think about a plan to increase the average pension contributions for rest of its staff to 15% from 13%. This is likely to cost the bank in the region of £20 million a year.
The IA recommends that staff and chief executives should expect the same proportion of their salaries in pensions.
"In line with the regular three-year review of the Group's remuneration policy, we are consulting shareholders on all elements of the policy including pension allowances," a spokesperson for the bank said.
In June, the board member who deals with executive pay at Lloyds told MPs that Mr Horta-Osorio is a "winner" who deserves the perks.
Stuart Sinclair said that staff did not resent the money that the chief executive takes home every year. Last year his total pay was worth nearly £6.3 million.
It is now consulting on Mr Horta-Osorio's pay. After talking to shareholders a proposal will be put to the board before being voted on by shareholders around May next year.
"As stated before, the group will continue to support the guidelines set out by the Investment Association and, once approved by the board, the proposed new remuneration policy will be presented to shareholders for approval at the 2020 AGM," Lloyds' spokesperson said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here