The founder of Superdry said he intends to stay with the business to steer it through his turnaround plans following a boardroom coup earlier this year as it reported a six-month sales decline.
Julian Dunkerton stood firm as the retailer saw an 11 per cent fall in sales to £369.1 million and swung to a pre-tax loss of £4.2m for the six months to October 26, as he attempts to re-position the business with more fashion-led products and less discounting.
Despite attempts to reassure the City that the turnaround was on track, investors took flight, with shares dropping 4%, down 203p to 479.7p.
READ MORE: Superdry founder Julian Dunkerton comeback vote
Mr Dunkerton said: “My first priority on returning to Superdry was to steady the business and return the culture to the one which drove its original success.
“A key part of that stabilisation process was the refreshing and restructuring of the executive and creative leadership of the business.
“With the board’s backing, I have committed myself to the chief executive role on a permanent basis until April 2021.
“We have also made a number of internal promotions to the executive team from within our respected ranks of leaders and managers, recognising the commitment and talent that already exists within Superdry.”
He added: “At this halfway point in our financial year, I am pleased with the progress we have made to comprehensively reset Superdry.
“We’re doing this through our product and brand, our physical and digital retail operations and a renewed focus on the retailing basics.
“We are only eight months into a process that will take two to three years, but I have great confidence in the strength of our new executive leadership team.”
Mr Dunkerton earlier staged a boardroom coup to retake control of the business after clashing with previous executives.
Euan Sutherland, the Scots former Superdry chief executive who resigned in April, was this week appointed chief executive of Saga.
READ MORE: Former Superdry chief joins Saga
Mr Dunkerton also admitted that the retail environment remains “very challenging” but was pleased with the results, which were in line with expectations.
The focus away from discounting took its toll on sales, but Superdry insists it remains the right strategy.
In future, Superdry, which has stores across Scotland, will only have three sales events, it added.
As a result, profit margins from sales were up 250 basis points – although this was knocked back due to the weak pound.
Negotiations with landlords are yielding some positive results, with an average reduction of 30% across the first six stores that were under review.
The company is also looking at its wholesale contracts, with the aim to quit any that are unprofitable.
Other areas under review include its franchise operation in China, closing US warehouses, and bringing forward sustainability plans including all cotton used in its products to be organic by 2030.
READ MORE: Superdry profits plummet 56%
Mr Dunkerton said: “We are making strong progress in transitioning back to our heritage as a design-led business.
“We are improving the product, with an increasing impact from our re-energised creative teams on the new ranges.”
He said the firm remains on track to increase the new seasonal option count by over 50% and is “adding specifically targeted collections and premium products”.
He added: “Superdry is accelerating its sustainability goals so that they will be achieved in 2030 rather than 2040 as previously planned.”
By that date, all cotton apparel will be organic compared with 10% for 2020, it said. Mr Dunkerton added: “Promotional sales will now only be used for clearance across three specific periods – two end of season sales and Black Friday – while pricing will remain constant on never-out-of-stock and core product until the end of a season.”
Analysts were cautious, but agreed there were signs of improvements.
Retail analysts at Peel Hunt said: “As expected, the numbers make for grim reading, reflecting the legacy position and stock file, although the statement is peppered with examples of product and operational improvements that are expected to form the foundations of more meaningful recovery next year.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here