Scotland’s largest conservation charity has signalled its intent to oppose a new attempt to develop TreeTop Stables, Faebuie, Culloden Moor as a holiday complex.
The National Trust for Scotland opposed the original planning application back in May 2018 and the application was subsequently turned down by the Highland Council.
The trust owns a key part of the battlefield of Culloden but not the land on which the stables are built.
The charity has raised its voice in the past against developments which it said threatened "the integrity of the wider historic battlefield", which ranged over a large area on 16 April 1746, and its setting.
The NTS said re-submitted proposal is once again based on the conversion of the TreeTop equestrian centre, which as it currently exists has little intrusive impact, to enable construction of holiday, leisure and hospitality facilities.
READ MORE: Anger over new £1m plans for holiday village at Culloden
Clea Warner, the National Trust for Scotland’s general manager for the Highlands & Islands said: “I can see nothing especially ‘new’ about this new submission.
“The previous application was turned down by Highland Council because it wasn't sufficiently sensitive to the surrounding woodland, and undermined the Conservation Area.
"While the 2020 application appears to suggest additional landscaping, quite frankly I can’t otherwise see much difference from the preceding 2018 submission.
“The application mentions that about 13 accommodation units would be built, but references 16 elsewhere.
"By our calculations, assuming the holiday accommodation is all new floor space, the applicants seem to be proposing 994 square metres of new buildings.
"These 13 or 16 lodges would be raised up on stilts, close to two storeys in height, with each appearing to be about the size of a static caravan.
“Our 2018 objection was based on four main issues: protection, conservation and, where appropriate, enhancement of the key historic landscape characteristics, particularly in the context of the Conservation Area; the scale of the development and its impact on woodland; the possibility of ‘development creep’ changing current land use; and, the possible precedent this would set thereby encouraging more developers to try their luck.
"Nothing in this fresh application alleviates any of these concerns.
“To be clear, we do not object to every planning application that comes forward around Culloden. Where changes to existing buildings or land do not result in a visual impact, change of use or materially extend the ‘footprint’, we tend not have concerns.
"Unfortunately, in this case, from what we have seen, our objection would be fully justified.”
READ MORE: Letters: The '45 was no war of independence
An agent for developer Inverness Paving said in its pre-application summary: "The proposal is to create a leisure/holiday let ‘village’ of provisionally 16 units in a mix of one bedroom - one-four person - and two bedroom - two-six person - lodges.
"The proposal is for the majority -13 - of these lodges to be elevated at two heights within the tree cover.
"These will be accessed by low impact gravelled paths through the existing trees, with individual stair accesses and timber deck balconies. Three units will be at ground level and will be designed to be fully accessible, within easy access of the designated parking.
"The lodges will be timber framed and clad, modularised and installed with minimum impact to existing mature and protected trees. Footings for the designed exposed steel column supports will be limited in area with concrete pads located to avoid root systems.
"Utilities supplies and drainage will similarly be routed to avoid damage to the woodland. It is anticipated that although selective trees will be removed to facilitate the development, these will comprise less than 10% of existing tree cover and will be agreed with the local authority’s tree officer.
"Access to the treetops lodges will be limited to foot traffic only. Ground cover to the woodland area will be selectively managed, to improve the habitat for wildlife and enhance the feel of a woodland setting.
"A central stone/pebble lined watercourse will be developed along the line of an existing drainage ditch with ground and rain water collected at a new small pond to the north boundary. Generally landscaping will be developed and enhanced by a new site wide landscape design based on the natural forest and open pasture environment."
The Battle of Culloden was the final confrontation of the Jacobite rising of 1745 and the last pitched battle fought on British soil. On 16 April 1746, the Jacobite forces of Prince Charles Edward Stuart were decisively defeated by Government troops on Culloden Moor.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article