AMIDST the debate about the right speed at which governments can and should reopen the economy, there is surely one topic which should be uncontroversial.
We absolutely need the Test and Protect system to work if the progress we have made in getting back into business is to be maintained.
Government at both national and local levels have their roles to play and it is right that we frequently monitor how well the system is working. Businesses are having to implement safety measures at an unprecedented pace and expense while recognising the importance of supporting Test and Protect measures including the Scottish Government’s now mandatory customer data collection in the hospitality industry.
The overwhelming majority of businesses operate in a responsible manner but cost pressures and dampened demand are really testing the viability to continue to trade.
A successful Test and Protect system becomes even more crucial as each month goes by and the Job Retention Scheme (JRS) is wound down.
The consequences of a local lockdown after the JRS has gone are likely to be highly unpleasant.
Small businesses are financially stretched – the evidence for which is laid out in last month’s recapitalisation report from The City UK – so closing businesses in the consumption economy for any length of time would likely be the final straw for many.
We don’t yet know how local lockdowns affect consumer confidence in the impacted cities but it is hardly likely to be positive. The Chamber will continue to argue, through British Chambers of Commerce, that measures should be in place to support businesses financially if they are closed by extended local lockdowns. If the Treasury chooses not to respond then Test and Protect is our most important remaining line of defence.
As the Aberdeen example has shown, businesses can easily find themselves at the heart of a cluster with their names publicly broadcast. I would bet that the vast majority of businesses are taking their responsibilities seriously but that small minority which are not will be the weak link that affects us all. The Chamber is therefore actively supporting the message that implementing the protocols necessary for Test and Protect to work is essential business practice but that Government should provide support to do so. It is very helpful when the Scottish Government explicitly acknowledges that many of the businesses involved in a cluster have been doing what is asked so that the naming does not automatically mean shaming.
With local lockdowns also comes the increasing role of local government engaging with their business communities to make sure guidelines are being implemented and followed.
My own experience in Glasgow has been a positive one with a new City Council team coordinating the relationship with business across all council departments, with the ability to influence individual business operations in the city. The team is helping businesses that are making serious efforts to work with the guidelines but may not quite be getting it right. They are not there to deal with businesses that are casually flouting the rules.
There are, of course, no guarantees that even with every business doing exactly what is asked that a local lockdown can be avoided. Clusters emerge for reasons that are nothing to do with business just as Greater Manchester is showing.
But where businesses can help to minimise the risks of a local lockdown it is surely right that we do so. The vast majority of company leaders care about their customers and their staff. They know that looking after them well is the best route to profits. Never has that been truer than today.
Stuart Patrick is the chief executive of Glasgow Chamber of Commerce
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here