ONE of Scotland’s most decorated distillers has expressed his confidence that the five-year suspension of US tariffs on single malt will turn into a permanent solution, writes Scott Wright.
The Scotch whisky industry received a massive boost this week when the UK and US Governments agreed a ceasefire on a trade dispute that has its roots in a row between Washington and the European Union over aircraft subsidies. It followed a temporary suspension of the tariffs in March.
The imposition of a 25 per cent tariff on single malt by the Trump administration in October 2019 is understood to have cost the Scotch whisky industry more than £500 million in lost exports.
The latest deal means no tariffs will be applied for five years while a permanent agreement is pursued.
Reacting to the tariff suspension, Billy Walker, head of the GlenAllachie Distillery in Speyside, told The Herald: “This looks pretty permanent to me. Five years is a long time in anyone’s life. [The fact] tariffs are removed is huge testimony to the efforts put in by the Westminster Government and Karen Betts of the Scotch Whisky Association. It is fantastic, they have done a really good job and they have not taken their eye of the ball.”
Mr Walker, who acquired GlenAllachie with Graham Stevenson and Trisha Savage in 2017 after selling the BenRiach Distillery Company the year before, said his business was now able to plan with more “clarity” how to approach the US market, “which stumbled a wee bit because of these obstacles to entry”.
He said: “In terms of a five-year plan, that is terrific. Now you can plan.”
Mr Walker also welcomed the trade deal signed between the UK and Australia this week, which removed tariffs of up to five per cent on exports of Scotch whisky. While he acknowledged Australia would never be his company’s biggest market, he said the deal is “important”.
Mr Walker noted: “It’s not a huge market at the moment, but there is no reason why it can’t [be]. It is absolutely in our footprint. It is market where we can engage with informed consumers.”
He added: “Anything that improves our ability to enter the market gives me a big smile.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here