Wing flaps failed on the Spanair flight that crashed last month, killing 154 people, and an alarm that is meant to warn pilots of the problem never sounded, investigators said yesterday.
They did not say whether they believe the flap malfunction caused the August 20 crash that killed all but 18 people on the MD-82. They offered no theory on what triggered Spain's worst air disaster in 25 years.
Investigators also said they needed to study further a faulty air temperature gauge outside the cockpit, a problem that forced the pilot to abandon a first take-off attempt and that Spanair has described as a minor glitch. The plane crashed about an hour later during its second attempt to take off.
The findings were drawn from the flight data and cockpit voice recorders which showed no evidence of problems with the engines.
The investigation found wing flaps, which provide extra lift during takeoff, failed to extend. But the pilots were unaware of the problem because the cockpit alarm did not go off.
Meanwhile, Russian media reported that the pilot of the Aeroflot jet that crashed killing all 88 people on board ignored commands from air traffic controllers.
Officials blamed a faulty engine for the crash on Sunday of the Boeing 737-500 in Perm.
Flight controller Irek Bikbov said the pilot was disobeying orders to descend on the final approach and instead taking the jet higher.
"He confirmed he was going down but kept climbing," Bikbov said.
"He was behaving in a strange manner and wasn't following my orders," he added. The last thing controllers heard was a scream in the cockpit seconds before the crash.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article