The conquering legions of ancient Rome may have helped to spread HIV and Aids throughout modern Europe, research suggests.
Scientists believe the invading Romans caused the loss of a genetic shield that makes some people resistant to infection by the Aids virus, HIV.
The gene variant, called CCR5-Delta32, impairs the ability of HIV to enter white blood cells.
People with the mutation are not as easily infected by the virus and take longer to develop full-blown Aids.
Generally, only Europeans and western Asians carry the variant, which becomes less widespread as you move south.
More than 15% of people in some parts of northern Europe have CCR5-Delta32, compared with fewer than 4% of Greeks.
Why this should be has puzzled scientists. But now researchers have found that the changing frequency of the variant reflects the changing boundary of the Roman empire from 500 BC to 500 AD.
A French study of nearly 19,000 DNA samples from across Europe showed that the number of people with the gene variant dwindled in regions conquered by the Romans.
Research leader Dr Eric Faure, from the University of Provence in Marseille, has come up with an intriguing theory to explain the link.
He does not think the Romans spread a different version of the gene into their colonies by breeding with the natives.
A more likely explanation, he believes, is that they introduced a fatal disease to which carriers of the CCE5-Delta32 variant were unusually susceptible.
New Scientist magazine reported yesterday: "As the Romans moved north, this disease killed people with the variant.
"Faure notes that the Romans introduced cats and donkeys to Europe which may have carried pathogens that spread to humans.
"What's more, the Romans inadvertently brought with them disease-carrying mosquitoes."
It is possible the disease in question was West Nile virus, or something like it.
Modern people with the CCR5-Delta32 mutation are more susceptible to the mosquito-borne infection, the New Scientist reported.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article