He came, he saw, and they, for the most part, snored.
Alistair Darling almost succeeded in overcoming trade union antipathy towards the government over pay by sending the entire TUC Congress to sleep yesterday afternoon. In just 19 soporific minutes the Chancellor wove the spell of the Greek god Somnus on the trade union movement.
"Times are tough, but we will get through," he repeated hypnotically as he told delegates that he could not risk economic stability by giving in to demands for pay increases or a windfall tax on power companies.
One slight groan, a few shaking heads, and one or two off-stage comments, the kind of sounds people make talking in their sleep, was all he had to suffer as he made his reasoned and reasonable case for pay restraint.
If he had stopped then and tiptoed out of the hall the delegates would probably wake up today, rubbing their eyes to headlines of a barnstorming speech that had wooed a sceptical audience. But it was not to be. They had listened, now it was his turn to listen.
During the question and answer session delegates came back to rude life. Sue Alwyn, of Unison, spoke for the entire hall when she told the Chancellor that the government's pay policy was "totally unacceptable". She said: "People are facing the stark choice of either food or warmth this winter. We are expected to accept year-on-year real pay cuts and it's not fair and it's not just."
She had louder applause than the person whose job it was to answer the question. Mr Darling's reply was jeered - someone shouted "rubbish", someone else said "nonsense" during his passage on public sector pay going up. The delegates, some representing members facing fuel poverty, were beginning to feel sour.
Given the mood earlier in the week, when union leaders were spitting tacks at ministers and saying David Cameron would make a better leader, Mr Darling got off lightly in the lion's den.
As he replied to each question with his sleep-inducing repeat warnings about the world economy and stability and Labour's record in office, he seemed pleased to be listened to with good grace for the most part.
They might have listened but they weren't impressed. "It was a typical anodyne speech by a government minister," said Micky Nicolas, a delegate from the Fire Brigade Union, who tutted and shook his head at key passages of the chancellor's address. "The arguments on pay are well rehearsed on both sides now, it will come down to industrial action."
Mr Darling's droning warning on the economy and inflation did get through to delegates though, albeit they did not like what they heard.
"It was about as warm as a toaster that's been turned off for a couple of hours," said Paul Kenny, leader of the GMB. "The message was grin and bear it."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article