Babies that are breastfed are far more likely to eat well and stay fit through childhood than bottle-fed infants, a landmark study showed yesterday.
The Growing Up In Scotland survey, commissioned by the Scottish Government in 2003 and updated this week, found a "significant" link between breastfeeding in infancy and a healthy body mass index (BMI) in later childhood.
More than one third (34%) of non-breastfed children suffered from a poor diet, according to the study, compared to just 16% of breastfed babies. Similarly, 17% of breastfed babies had a "good" diet while just 7% of non-breastfed ate well, the study showed.
The study also found that nearly one in five (19%) of non-breastfed babies would go on to eat not a single vegetable on a typical day.
Researchers said there was a definite link between breastfeeding and diet, but added that there may be other factors to consider. The report said: "The association between diet in childhood and breastfeeding history is clear.
"However, this does not explain if being breastfed is the sole cause of differences in diet or if there are other characteristics which make a mother both more likely to breastfeed and more likely to feed her child healthier foods."
One likely explanation was that wealthier mothers were more likely to breastfeed their babies than poorer parents were, and the study consistently found better diets and higher levels of physical activity among children in more affluent households.
However, researchers also wrote: "It is interesting to note that differences between breastfed and non-breastfed children persist, even when isolated by socio-economic classification or income group."
Children's minister Adam Ingram voiced concern at the inequalities highlighted in the report, and vowed to fight these problems in government.
"Such trends form part of the wider, deep-rooted social problems in Scotland such as poverty, poor health and lack of opportunity, which we are tackling head-on through the early years framework," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article