Cockfights, which have drawn crowds to small pits and full-blown arenas in towns around Louisiana for generations, will be against the law next week.
On Friday, Louisiana will become the last state to outlaw the fights, a move that enthusiasts say marks the end of a rich rural tradition.
"The culture, the custom of the Cajun people, it's gone," said Chris Daughdrill, who breeds fighting roosters. "It's another one of the rights that big government has taken away from the people."
Maybe so, but supporters and opponents agree the blood sport will not be wiped out entirely. Like bootlegging, cockfights will continue on the sly, although getting caught could mean face fines of up to $1000 (£500) and six-month prison terms.
"They're still going to fight, they're still going to fight for years to come," said Elizabeth Barras, who with her husband ran a cockfighting pit for 14 years. "They've still got cockfighting in every state. They just hide it from the law."
The fights between specially trained roosters are held in arenas or in back yards. The birds are fitted with sharp metal blades or curved spikes on their legs, and instinctively attack each other. The match can last more than an hour, with one or both animals dead or maimed.
In banning the fights, Louisiana relented after years of pressure from the US Humane Society and other animal-rights groups.
Ex-governor Kathleen Blanco, a native of Cajun country, where the fights have deep roots, signed the ban last year, closing a loophole in state law that excluded chickens from animal cruelty laws. -AP
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article