RETIRED after 40 years in the electricity supply industry, I am saddened to read that ScottishPower's Whitelee 322-megawatt project will provide enough "green energy" to power 200,000 homes. This misleading half-truth is unworthy of a reputable electric power utility whose core staff are chartered engineers with a professional commitment to objective truth.
The electricity generated by the project will, because of its entirely wind-based origin, be instantaneously unpredictable and intermittent. It can only provide the MWh amount of electricity implied above on a cumulative annual basis. Also, it will only operate at its full 322MW power rate for little more than 10per cent of the total 8760 hours in any year.
For the remainder of that time its output will range from just below full load to zero. Indeed, there will be periods of many days, particularly during still, cold, anticyclonic weather, when it will be at a complete standstill. If the claimed 200,000 homes were not permanently connected to the national grid there would be no day-to-day security of supply at all.
Yet elsewhere, among our uncomprehending senior politicians, there are those suggesting that the national grid is out of date and redundant, replaceable by forms of microgeneration which neither they nor anyone else can even specify. Does the governmental left hand know what the right hand is doing?
Furthermore, National Grid plc, in its capacity as GB system operator, will be saddled with the complex and costly task of finding at any time throughout the year fully controllable generating plant with response times rapid enough to meet every variation in wind strength.
The total conventional plant committable at any time would have to be prepared to match the 322MW full load capacity of these wind turbines and involve our limited reserves of pumped storage as well as natural-flow hydro and gas turbines which alone are f lexible enough to balance many of the vagaries of wind.
Alan Shaw, 25 Sears Close, Aylsham, Norwich.
AS A retired marine (steam) engineer (quarter Scottish), I enjoyed Robert Durward's letter (April 28). He made a good engineering case for abandoning this helter-skelter race to destroy our countryside, but he overlooked what I believe could be another serious objection to windmills.
I wonder if anybody has carried out a lifetime CO 2/carbon audit. How much carbon is emitted during the manufacture and installation of a windmill, including the massive concrete foundation and by all the machinery to transport, erect and construct the road needed to its location? And it must not be forgotten it will all happen again at the end of the windmill's life (or will it? ). All this for an inefficient machine that requires another source of power standing by for when the wind is blowing a gale or not at all, whose carbon emissions (unless nuclear) must be included in the audit.
When so-called independent commentators announce how many homes this windmill is capable of supplying they should add "when the wind is blowing at the right strength".
Keith Denison, Laga Bay, Ardnamurchan.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article