Douglas Fraser: "The Labour front bench response sounds a bit confused"
The long-awaited announcement that two accident and emergency departments have been saved from closure was made today by the Scottish Government.
Health secretary Nicola Sturgeon told MSPs local NHS chiefs had submitted proposals which would retain A&E services at Monklands and Ayr hospitals.
Both units had previously been earmarked for closure under controversial plans that sparked protests.
"The fact that the previous administrations, notwithstanding the lack of a clear and robust evidence base, was prepared to sanction the closure of their A&E units beggars belief," said Ms Sturgeon.
The proposals from NHS Lanarkshire and NHS Ayrshire and Arran boards also allowed for further development of A&E services at the hospitals, she said.
In June last year Ms Sturgeon reversed the previous Executive's decision to close the A&E units at both hospitals, and ordered both health boards to come up with fresh proposals which would then go out to independent scrutiny.
The scrutiny panel published its report in January, and both health boards then agreed their preferred plan and submitted this to Ms Sturgeon.
Announcing that she was accepting both sets of proposals, Ms Sturgeon said: "These proposals will ensure not only the maintenance but also the enhancement of the valued A&E services at Ayr and Monklands hospitals."
She told MSPs that this amounted to "a promise kept by this SNP government."
Ms Sturgeon said: "This government has been consistent in our belief that the decisions of our predecessors to close these A&E departments was wrong."
She went on: "There is little doubt that the original consultations in Ayrshire and Lanarkshire and the subsequent decisions made by the boards compromised the trust, faith and confidence that local people had in their NHS."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article