A leading conservation charity has lodged an official objection to a council's plans to include one of Scotland's most iconic mountains on a new network of paths.
The John Muir Trust believes that Perth and Kinross Council's proposal to designate the path to the 3553ft summit of Schiehallion as a "core path" could mislead the public about the risks of climbing the mountain.
Under land reform laws passed by the Scottish Parliament in 2003, local authorities must draw up a system of core paths which can give the public reasonable access throughout the council area.
Perth and Kinross Council included the route on Schiehallion on its proposed list of core paths and the first period of public consultation on the plans ended yesterday.
Andrew Campbell, land manager for the John Muir Trust, which owns the mountain and built the path in 2003, said: "While we completely support the development of a core path network in Perthshire, we do not think that this route fits the council's own criteria of what makes a core path.
"The route is not an access path linking two or more communities.
"The trust is also concerned that designating the path on Schiehallion could be dangerously misleading for visitors who do not have much experience of hill walking in Scotland. To many people a core path network gives the impression that the routes are relatively easy, fairly low level and not too arduous.
"Routes to the tops of mountains do not fall into this category," he added.
A spokesman for the council said: "All comments received will be taken into account when preparing the draft core paths plan."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article