LINDA DEUTSCH
Two elderly women accused of killing two homeless men to collect millions of dollars in insurance payouts have been convicted of conspiracy to murder and one was convicted of the murders themselves.
The jury was to hear more arguments yesterday before deciding remaining charges against Helen Golay, 77, and Olga Rutterschmidt, 75.
Golay was convicted of the murders of Kenneth McDavid, 50, in 2005 and Paul Vados, 73, in 1999. She was also convicted of the conspiracy charges in both killings.
Rutterschmidt was convicted of conspiracy to murder McDavid for financial gain.
Prosecutors said the women collected £1.4m from insurance policies on the lives of two homeless men who were killed in staged hit-and-runs.
Golay could face sentences of life in prison without the possibility of parole. Rutterschmidt could face a sentence of 25 years to life.
Prosecutors said the women recruited their prey from among the homeless of Hollywood, invested thousands in insurance policies on them and in putting them up in flats, then drugged them and ran them over in secluded alleys.
Both men initially appeared to have been victims of hit-and-run accidents, and police linked the cases only in late 2005 when a detective investigating one overheard a colleague describe a similar case.
The women were likened to the old lady killers in the film Arsenic and Old Lace, who poisoned their victims.
A key witness was a homeless man who said he was targeted as another victim but left when Rutterschmidt put him under pressure to sign papers. Jimmy Covington, 48, said she approached him on a street in 2005 and promised benefits, a place to stay and money.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article