Sitting in the area from which Hitler watched the Olympic long jump were the grand-daughters of Jesse Owens and Luz Long, who won gold and silver in 1936. After Dwight Phillips won the title for the third time, with 8.54 metres, the pair, and Long’s son, Kai, presented the medals.
Owens had won with 8.06m, same as Britain’s Chris Tomlinson did for seventh on Saturday night.
Kai was just 17 months old when his father was killed in the second world war. Owens died in 1980.
Owens won four golds in 1936, but Long is credited with helping him when he looked likely to be eliminated. He advised Owens to move his check mark, and play safe, because he would still qualify easily. He did, and won the title.
I spoke with Long on Saturday, when he played down his father’s actions, which came to be interpreted as a snub to Hitler and his doctrine of Aryan supremacy.
“It was not a question of race, of being black and white,” said Long. “It was the normal attitude of pure, amateur sportsmen in those days, clean in every respect. It was absolutely normal in old amateur sport to help one another.”
But he added that it lit a flame. “This flame became bright, then brighter, and even more bright. And is still burning today.”
Owen’s grand-daughter, Marlene Dortch, agreed it was spontaneous: “Like when Rosa Parks sat down on that bus. Her intent was not to start a movement. She was tired, and felt she should be able to sit down on that bus.
“I feel great that I’m sitting in the box where Hitler once was, enjoying time with the Long family, that Luz Long’s family and Jesse Owens’ family are here to be celebrated. And Hitler? Who?”
Kai long-jumped once, he said. “I was 16, and did about 5.50m but I was introduced to golf that year. It was like a bacillus”. He played off three.
A final letter his father wrote to Owens said in part: “Someday, find my son . . . tell him about how things can be between men on this earth.”
Owens did, and the families still maintain contact.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereCommments are closed on this article