YOUR report that Scottish ministers are kept out of the loop in UK negotiations with European institutions and frequently excluded from meetings, with often "disastrous" consequences, should come as no surprise to anyone (January 22).
In an enlarged European Union of 27 members, if you aren't at the top table you simply don't matter. With independence, Scottish ministers will be free to represent Scotland's needs and priorities in Europe by right. Under the terms of the Treaty of Nice, an independent Scotland would have seven votes in the Council of Ministers, while at present Scotland has none. We would have almost twice the number of MEPs to stand up for Scotland's interests in the European Parliament, and we would be able to nominate a European Commissioner.
Thousands of jobs in Scotland depend on exports to the EU. In defending Scotland's interests, an independent government will be able to give priority to areas which are now neglected by British representatives in the EU, not least the Scottish fishing industry. Ten new countries joined the EU in May 2004, including Cyprus, Estonia, Lithuania, Malta, Latvia and Slovenia. These are all smaller than Scotland, yet all of them now have a seat at Europe's top table, recognising how vital it is to be represented in the EU as a full independent member state. It's time Scotland did too.
Estonia's Minister of Foreign Affairs, Kristiina Ojuland, commented: "Smaller states already take a more international view because we cannot afford to ignore the existence of bigger states. But we will take every opportunity to influence events because if we do not we will be just as affected by them, and have things done to us instead of playing our part in shaping events and preparing for them."
Until independence, Scotland will continue to be affected by decisions it has played no role in shaping and Scottish ministers and civil servants will hold the coats as our London masters negotiate away our interests.
Alex Orr, 35 Bryson Road, Edinburgh. YOUR report, Scotland "frozen out of Brussels", totally demolishes the claim that as part of the UK Scotland "punches above its weight" in the EU and elsewhere. Our interests are only taken into account when they are to be negotiated away for what London considers more important matters.
Do even the most dismissive of unionists, lining up in their desperate determination to run us down, think we could do any worse by representing our own interest ourselves?
Hamish Scott, 17 Carlaverock Drive, Tranent. AMID an election campaign deluged with ridiculous scare upon scare it was refreshing to read Douglas Fraser's article on the leaked report to the First Minister from the Scottish Executive's own top civil servant in Brussels. This revealed Scotland was suffering badly because of Whitehall indifference to Scottish priorities in Europe.
The first obvious question is why we Scots require someone to "leak" this important information before it comes into the public domain? The second question is, how can Scotland's First Minister, who purports to have Scotland's, rather than the Labour Party's, best interests at heart, continue to support the discredited Union when even his own advisers are telling him it is a complete shambles and is working against the interests of the people of Scotland?
It's time Scotland had a First Minister whose first priority was Scotland rather than his own colleagues' political survival.
Councillor Celia Lawson, Renfrewshire Council, Paisley.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article