A meeting is being organised to resolve the dilemmas over hearings into the deaths of Scots-based armed forces personnel who die abroad.
Holyrood Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill has written to his Westminster counterpart, Jack Straw, asking for their officials to "take forward our joint desire to find a solution to the problem of the investigation of deaths of Scottish-based service personnel abroad."
Scottish civil servants believe the issue is not as simple as Holyrood legislating to allow fatal accident inquiries to investigate armed forces deaths abroad, as has been suggested.
Mr Straw's deputy, Bridget Prentice, had written to the Holyrood minister, saying: "I appreciate there would need to be a change to the primary legislation in Scotland to achieve this and it would also have implications for non- service deaths overseas.
"It might also possibly have implications for coroner law in England and Wales, for example, to allow a coroner to request that an FAI be held by the procurator-fiscal in the district most closely connected with the service person in Scotland and to enable transfers between England and Wales and Scotland."
One idea mooted has been for parts of Ministry of Defence bases north of the border to be transferred to English jurisdiction so that coroners can preside there, but the Scottish Government would prefer the adoption of the FAI process under sheriffs provided technical difficulties can be overcome.
It is believed that in addition to primary legislation at Holyrood and Westminster to allow this solution it could require the re-opening of the Scotland Act under which defence issues are strictly reserved.
Even if all the legal technicalities can be overcome there is also the issue of expense. Holyrood ministers are reluctant to write a blank cheque for what can be hugely expensive inquiries, involving witnesses being brought from all over the world, and will be seeking assurances on this.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article