The blood transfusion service yesterday warned against calls to allow gay men to make donations.
National director Keith Thompson told the Scottish Parliament that HIV infection was rising among gay men.
In a letter to the public petitions committee, Mr Thompson said that one-third of HIV-infected blood samples were revealed to be from gay men.
Mr Thompson said: "Safer sex will keep most gay men free from infection, but men who have sex with men are asked not to give blood because they are known to be at an increased risk of acquiring HIV and a number of other sexually transmitted infections, particularly syphilis, many of which are carried in the blood."
A petition by Rob McDowall was lodged with the committee calling for a review to allow healthy gay and bisexual men to donate blood.
Gay and lesbian groups argued that men were allowed to donate blood one year after having unprotected sex with a woman known to be HIV positive. They said current rules also allowed men to donate one year after having unprotected sex with intravenous drug users or prostitutes.
Mr McDowall's petition was backed by the National Union of Students, which branded the current rules discriminatory. The union said people should be assessed on their "participation in high-risk activity", rather than their social group.
America and Germany operate similar rules to the UK but Australia, Japan and Hungary defer donation among gay men for one year after sex, campaigners said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article