Case Study JOHN Fergusson got a job in his local steelworks when he left school in Ayr aged 15. After 46 years' hard graft, he hoped to retire in 2011, aged 60.
Instead, after the collapse of the pension scheme operated by United Engineering Forgings (UEF) in 2001, he has had to postpone his retirement plans by five years.
He is among up to 1300 steelworkers at the former British Steel plant who are seeking redress for the shortfall in their pensions.
The Financial Assistance Scheme (FAS) set up by the government in 2004 will pay Mr Fergusson up to half of his full pension, meaning he will receive £6000 a year rather than £12,000. But the FAS payments are not index-linked to inflation and will not pay a lump sum on retirement.
"I had never intended to work until I was 65. We work six days a week in here and I thought it was reasonable to want to retire at 60," he said. "I'm pretty bitter. A lot of my friends have retired at 55. If I'd worked in the local council or police force I could have retired much earlier on a full pension."
Mr Fergusson, a production manager at the plant, began paying into the pension scheme in 1971. In 2001, when it collapsed, he was paying around 7% of his salary into the scheme. While some older colleagues have received up to 80% of their pension under the FAS scheme, workers two years younger are due to receive no compensation at all.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article