MORE than half of nurses in Scotland feel they are too busy to provide the standards of care they would like for patients, with the majority having concerns over staffing levels.
That's the result of a major new survey of morale and workload issues, due to be published tomorrow, which is carried out every two years by the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) Scotland.
The research found that 56% of NHS nurses feel they are too busy to provide the care they would like, an increase of 8% from 2005. Just one quarter believe there are sufficient staff in their workplace to provide a good standard of care.
More than 80% also viewed their workload as too heavy and their pay poor in comparison to other professional groups.
The findings come at a time when there is increasing reliance on nurses to provide services - such as out-of-hours care - in the NHS. However, nursing leaders have warned that a target-driven culture is having a detrimental impact on staff.
Anne Thomson, acting deputy director of RCN Scotland, argued that those in charge of running the health service had different priorities from those working in it.
"There is a lack of staff, constant change and government pressures around what they want delivered, as opposed to asking staff what they think needs to be delivered," she said. "This can manifest itself in things like the emphasis on clearing waiting lists, whereas a nurse or a doctor's priority is to provide the best possible care to someone who is ill."
She added: "It is almost as if it is about the quantity and volume - rather than about the quality - of patient care."
The survey of more than 700 RCN members also revealed that a quarter of nurses working in community settings are aged over 50, compared to 17% working in hospitals. Thomson said this raised concerns over proposals outlined in the Kerr report, which was published two years ago, as the future "blueprint" for the NHS.
"There are a lot of nurses coming up to retiral, particularly in the community," she said. "That is a big worry, because if we look at the Kerr report it is about shifting the balance of care from acute to community settings, so that is where we really need to invest in nursing.
"We need to do something about positively regarding our older nurses and keeping them in the workforce - for example, phased retirals or perhaps taking them away from the frontline into more supervision roles."
Last week, a report from Audit Scotland warned that the decision by nearly all GPs to opt out of treating patients outwith surgery hours had increased pressure on other parts of the NHS. It said nurses, paramedics and the telephone helpline NHS24 were now being relied upon to help provide out-of-hours care.
Mary Scanlon MSP, health spokeswoman for the Conservatives, said that many of the issues raised in the RCN survey were not new.
She added: "Given the Audit Scotland report on the out-of-hours service, it is very worrying that more and more is being expected of nurses, but without them being valued and financially rewarded for many of the tasks they are expected to do.
"Quite an unfair burden is being put on nurses and other healthcare professionals such as paramedics, as they are not being given the support by the NHS to carry out these tasks."
However, Labour MSP Andy Kerr, the previous health minister, said the recent pay reform known as Agenda For Change had offered the opportunity to better recognise and reward staff.
He added: "The Scottish Executive has invested in the NHS to a significant degree with more doctors, nurses and professionals than ever before. Likewise, Labour invested in the skills of those staff."
Shona Robison, minister for public health, said that the ratio of nurses per head of population in Scotland was better than any other part of Britain.
She added: "Significant investment has been made in recent years to increase staff numbers in the NHS - for example we have record numbers of nurses and midwives in post as well as record numbers of students in training.
"This is helping to ease the burden on nursing staff and share the workload more evenly."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article