Portuguese police officers yesterday dismissed a tip-off that the body of missing Madeleine McCann was buried in scrubland about nine miles from where she was abducted after carrying out a search with sniffer dogs.
Starting at dawn, they cordoned off an area north of the tiny village of Arao, 15 kilometres from Praia da Luz.
For several hours, more than 30 Guarda Nacional Repulicana, 20 Policia Judiciara (PJ) and four specialist dogs examined the scrubland.
Cordons were established on all roads surrounding the search area, a desolate hillside covered in trees and wasteland just north of the main road to Faro. But by 9.30am the search had been called off and the letter dismissed.
Chief Inspector Olegario Sousa, from the PJ, said: "The search has been carried out. This clue has been completely checked and the result was negative so the investigation goes on."
He said the dogs had not found anything significant and denied claims that officers had dug up land.
The formal search was carried out two days after Portuguese police were told about an anonymous letter alleging Madeleine had been buried under a pile of rocks.
The letter, accompanied by a map marked with a cross, was sent to Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf on Monday.
The father of Madeleine said his Catholic faith would be "severely tested" if his daughter was not found safe and well.
Gerry McCann and his wife Kate have led a tireless campaign to try to find the four-year-old who was abducted from Praia da Luz 43 days ago.
They have leaned heavily on religion, but Mr McCann admitted the prospect of her not coming back would stretch their belief.
"If we don't get Madeleine back alive and well, I am sure our faith will be severely tested," he told The Tablet, a Catholic newspaper. "At the end of it, we will still have our faith and also comfort Madeleine will be looked after."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article