Perhaps it is not that surprising there has been so much sledging and snarling between the combatants in this Ashes series.
After all, if familiarity breeds contempt, then the senior members in both teams must truly hate the sight of one another.
Mercifully, therefore, with Australia having already wrapped up the campaign 3-0 - an outcome which almost nobody predicted and certainly none of the English pundits - it will not be too long before the ageing gunslingers in opposite camps finally trudge out of the saloon to Boot Hill and leave the stage clear for the next generation.
With the countries not squaring up again until summer 2015, one always envisaged there would be significant changes in personnel between now and then. Yet the scale of the rebuilding process offers a stark reminder of how quickly sport transforms young pups into old sweats. There may be no more Ashes conflict for Michael Clarke or Brad Haddin, Chris Rogers or Ryan Harris and Shane Watson, no more chances to reclaim the urn for Kevin Pietersen and Michael Carberry, Graeme Swann, Matt Prior and James Anderson, some of whom have resembled leg-weary busted flushes during the last month's frenetic action Down Under.
And these may not be the only casualties once the final two Tests have been completed. Such is the unforgiving nature of the Test calendar these days that the Aussies have to venture to South Africa early in 2014, where they might experience more problems against Dale Steyn and Morne Morkel than has been the case in their dealings with the flaccid England attack. Andy Flower and co, for their part, must ask themselves some hard questions, because they have been outplayed in every department. Do they persist with a maverick such as Pietersen when his approach suggests he is already mentally gearing up for a lucrative swansong in the Pyjama Game? Or do they clean out the dead wood immediately and allow Ben Stokes, Joe Root, James Taylor, Gary Ballance and their compatriots to attune to the mental demands of the toughest form of the sport?
They surely must recognise that their preparation for this tour was a mixture of complacent and shambolic, a combination which allowed Mitchell Johnson to rip through them at will in Brisbane and Adelaide. But one of the most obvious lessons of the one-sided contest was that many of the losers had neither the requisite stomach for the fight or the ability to display the necessary grit in adversity.
Can these qualities be taught at the highest level if they don't exist instinctively? Time after time it has seemed as if Alastair Cook, for instance, has no idea how to combat genuine pace, let alone muster a decent score. And most of his colleagues have similarly withered on the vine against virtually the same opponents they trounced comfortably all of three months ago.
That, surely, has to be one of the lessons absorbed from this sorry mess. Yes, the Australians have thoroughly deserved their success and few people are better at rubbing the losers' noses in the brown stuff.
But never again, whether for the benefit of television companies, the ICC or anybody else, should these nations agree to a programme of 10 Tests in less than six months.
Otherwise, what should be special ends up being utterly mundane.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article