HAVE you ever been in the situation in a restaurant with a group of colleagues, the sour dough bread rolls have just been passed around, and you get handed the wine list with the task of picking for everyone?
This can be a daunting challenge as you probably won't particularly know everyone's preferences, and they'll all have ordered different food. So, what goes with rack of lamb, chicken supreme, spicy enchiladas and Caesar salad? You also have the trauma of deciding how expensive to go; you don't want to go too cheap and Brian from accounting won't let you go too expensive. It's a minefield!
Well, as your intrepid wine dude, I have a few suggestions. The house wines will be acceptable as most restaurants will sell 10 times as much of their house red and white than they will the second wine on the list. It will be a crowd-pleaser and a safe bet, but you could be more adventurous.
Picking the Chilean Merlot is not a bad call. Most wine lists will have one and most people will like it. It should be good-quality, and will match all of the dishes on the table. If the list includes a Chilean Carmenere, you could be impress the boss by saying that the Carmenere would be a good choice as it's like Merlot on steroids.
My last suggestion is slightly left-field. Ignore the house wine, and jump straight to the second of the list wines. (Not the top one, the second one). This is usually the favourite bottle of the wine expert that designed the list. He or she would love to sell more of it, so it's good value and it will be interesting and dynamic. Perhaps it will be an Austrian Gruner-Veltliner or a Malagousia from Greece. A bold choice, but one that is almost sure to end in promotion.
Pete Stewart is Glasgow director of Inverarity One to One, 185a Bath Street, Glasgow www.inverarity121.com
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article