Islena, 51 Bell Street, Glasgow 0141 552 3530
Lunch/Dinner £25-30
Food rating 6/10
IN March, sales at restaurants and bars in the US surpassed those at grocery stores. How long before the UK goes the same way? The other day I passed through a small town awash with ropey-looking takeaways, the only other apparent food option being a hulking Tesco. Is it any wonder that many people who live in such places lose the will to cook?
In the US, the investment firm Morgan Stanley identified "a younger cohort" more willing to spend on "food away from home". My impression here too is that for all but the most up-market establishments, it's a younger demographic that keeps them going. Reviews apart, I belong to an older cohort that restaurateurs must work harder to woo. I'm attracted to places serving up something that I couldn't, or wouldn't do myself at home, and I have the experienced home cook's meanness. Pay £8 for a tomato/goat cheese/balsamic/rocket assembly job salad? You must be joking!
So it's either got to be a place with professional chef skill that I lack, or properly ethnic, or it has special equipment (eg wood fired oven, a deep fryer, a charcoal grill), or some such selling point. Otherwise I can bore for Britain, along the lines of: "You could make this at home for a fraction of the price."
We didn't have a bad meal in Islena, the new Spanish outfit that has moved into the premises formerly occupied by Central Market, in Glasgow's Merchant City, but equally I don't feel a burning urge to return. The menu isn't very long, and the dishes aren't quite exciting enough. There are specials, although our server forgot to tell us about them. Descriptions, such as "baked aubergines", "seafood rice", are brief to the point of terseness. Economy of language in food description is always to be applauded, but the reality wasn't lighting me up either. And while there was nothing actively wrong with, for instance, our tuna tartare with avocado - the fish was fresh, the avocado ripe - it was a classic case of something I could do at home, and definitely with much more flair. Maybe it wasn't seasoned enough; and it was definitely too cold. I couldn't complain, but I couldn't enthuse either. Ditto the grilled sardines, cooked under the salamander. They were acceptably, if not vivaciously, fresh but otherwise so plain as to be, well, dull.
And there's a problem with the very concept of a Mediterranean restaurant in Scotland: we just don't have the sun-soaked produce to deliver the savour conjured up by that term. To make gazpacho, for instance, you need sweet, mild onions and peppers, ripe tomatoes, crunchy cucumber, and a lick of juicy, summer-fresh garlic. Lookalikes from northern European glasshouses won't produce the same pleasing result. Islena's honest attempt was felled by onions too pungent to eat raw, the inevitable watery veg, and olive oil that - yes, I can't stop myself complaining here - wasn't quite up to the job. Is it even worth making gazpacho here unless you grow your own veg? Cold soup in Scotland is always a hard sell at any time of year.
The dish described, relatively loquaciously, as "hake, clams, ham, sherry", was another "meh" offering. The fish moist, apparently unseasoned, soft-skinned, with a blob of thin, vinegary aioli that had the whiff of stored garlic, sat on a thin puddle of juice with just six clams, and tiny specks of ham in it. An empanada formed from Cranks-style pastry was stuffed with a chickpea and spinach mix of promising-undergraduate-learning-to-cook standard, and flanked by a pile of rocket that suggested a kitchen bereft of better ideas. £12 for this underwhelming vegetarian dish of neither pricey ingredients nor demanding cooking?
I'd be curious to know why Islena thinks it can justify £4 for a meagre amount of gritty rice pudding overpowered by vanilla. Moist almond and orange Santiago tart was a winner, but at £5, the portion needed to be scaled up by a third or a half.
Where's the spark here? And who's making the big decisions? For the moment, Islena feels rudderless.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article