There’s a lot to be said for wine shops having a Spring-clean of their shelves and clearing through some older lines at this time of year to make way for the new and exciting stuff that’s already on the water. Make sure you ask your wine merchant for advice regarding any hidden gems that they’re drinking at home. You can often pick up a bargain, or at least try something that wouldn’t normally be on your radar.
I was delighted to see that M&S are currently doing a similar exercise with a third off an extensive range of clearance wines until 1st April. Everything is on a strictly limited basis, with many lines only being available in selected shops. And when they’re gone, they’re gone. There were more than a few bottles that tweaked my interest, but the one I took home last weekend was the Domaine du Pimont Saint-Aubin 1er Cru 2015 (M&S, was £25, now £11 to clear). £11. Previously £25. Some white Burgundies mature really quickly in the bottle, losing the primary fruit before their time. I wondered if this would be the case with the Saint-Aubin, especially considering the size of the discount. Oh my goodness, it was lovely. There’s still an appley freshness to the wine backed up by a lovely rich, buttery note. We had the bottle on Sunday with Laura’s homemade burgers (we would normally have picked a red, but I was desperate to taste the Saint-Aubin), and it certainly stood up to the big flavours in the dish. It would also have worked with roast chicken, James Martin’s lobster mac‘n’cheese or a good, creamy fish stew.
Saint-Aubin sits alongside Puligny and Chassagne-Montrachet in the Cote de Beaune in Burgundy and the whites are amongst the best buys of the region. Bear in mind, they are normally much more expensive than £11. You’d expect to pay £25-£30 for a good one, as opposed to £45+ for a decent Puligny. Bargain.
I would suggest contacting your local M&S branch in advance to see if they have any bottles left, or simply turn up and if they have sold out, have a rummage and find something else of interest. You won’t have to search for long. Cheers!
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here