I love a big bowl of spicy chilli at this time of the year, especially if you have a full of character, full-bodied and full-on spicy red to go alongside.
I’d go for an Australian Shiraz dominant blend as the best ones will have an approachability coupled with a nice peppery edge that will match the dish perfectly.
Ideally, you want the wine to jump out the glass and lick you around the chops with all the exuberance of a golden retriever puppy. The key here is the fruit, as hot and spicy dishes tend to accentuate the tannins in a wine, so with a decent and spicy chilli you really want more fruit than tannin in your glass.
The Barossa and (nearby) Clare Valleys are producing a wealth of wonderful wines at the moment. Producers such as Henschke, d’Arenberg, Woodstock and Jim Barry are all worth seeking out.
Henschke is my current favourite producer from the area and their Henry’s Seven Shiraz, Grenache, Viognier, Mourvedre Blend 2007 (Inverarity One to One, £44.99 limited availability) is a doozy. Note the vintage, this is a mature wine with a ton of flavour, power and oomph. Oomph is a technical wine term. Despite all the clout, this wine is incredibly well balanced in the glass.
A great bottle at a fraction of the price is the Woodstock Shiraz Cabernet 2011 (Inverarity One to One, £11.49). This will knock all the supermarket equivalents out the park as well as ticking all of your chilli boxes due to the balance of dark fruit and peppery spice in your glass.
If you’d rather have a straight Shiraz, get over to Majestic and grab a bottle of their Jim Barry Lodge Hill Clare Valley Shiraz 2017 (Majestic, £15.99). This is a wonderful wine at a wonderful price.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here