When Roger Daltrey arrived on stage, he was armed with a cup of tea, rather than anything stronger.
Age has not yet mellowed the 67-year-old’s formidable voice.
Now recovered from a throat scare 18 months ago, Daltrey sounded suitably commanding throughout both sections of this gig, the first part delivering the Who’s 1969 rock opera Tommy in full, the second providing a selection of hits, covers and rarities. Daltrey’s own blunt manner hasn’t changed from those days, and he stressed this wasn’t a Who show, although the band’s shadow loomed large.
Daltrey doesn’t whirl about these days. But there was still rippling power vocally, as well as some microphone twirling. The first such gesture occurred early into Tommy, following the crashing Overture. Although hearing the record’s hybrid of styles and concepts in full was at times stunning, as on Sparks insistent groove, a sturdy The Acid Queen and an unsurprisingly rambunctious Pinball Wizard, it highlighted some of the record’s flab throughout its excessive second half.
It was performed faithfully by Daltrey’s unstylish yet highly competent backing band, who included Pete Townshend’s younger brother Simon. There was no denying the sheer heft of We’re Not Gonna Take It’s climax, before Daltrey delivered over an hour of further material.
Some selections, such as a messy Pictures Of Lily and a hokey Johnny Cash medley, were best forgotten. Yet there was also a resounding Baba O’Riley, a blues-heavy revamp of Who Are You and an aggressive Young Man Blues. Those tracks still possessed a substantial force, much like Daltrey.
HHH
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article