One can only imagine the advert Hurts placed looking for backing dancers.
A willingness to solemnly stride on stage wearing hooded robes, with skimpy attire underneath, while waving black flags portentously were presumably key qualifications, given that’s how this show opened. If only the reminder of the performance had been quite as interesting.
As the Manchester duo’s impeccably attired singer Theo Hutchcraft pointed out, Hurts were playing King Tut’s just over a year ago. On that occasion, they effortlessly stole the show and looked stars in the making, a status to which they have ascended. This gig, their last for a while, was rather less flattering, for one very clear reason. As the venues have become larger, so has the group’s sound, but in an unseemly way.
There may have been a string section and guitarist on a crowded stage, but the focus was tilted heavily towards nothing but keyboards and drums. The drums, in particular, were tediously crashed into, bludgeoning any subtlety into a non-stop puddle of noise, and leaving the other players as a decorative presence.
That ensured there was a lack of light and shade throughout, with most tunes inevitably becoming a muddled din, with Hutchcraft’s decent voice wiped out. What made this situation all the more frustrating is that Hurts have a strong collection of songs, with an early triumvirate of the sweeping Blood, Tears and Gold, the driving Evelyn and the infectiously catchy Sunday a sterling run of tunes, and the set-closing Better Than Love a rambunctiously danceable finale.
Better was the toned-down doomed romance of Affair, gloriously different. More of that in the future would be welcome.
HH
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article