The bishops and cardinals who have been so furiously, and a little fearfully perhaps, condemning the plans to allow gay people to get married say they are opposed to the reform because marriage can only be between a man and a woman.
But what the biographies in Gay Life Stories demonstrate is that it's not quite as simple as that.
The author of the collection, Robert Aldrich, calls the life stories, in a nice cheeky use of religious language, a "congregation" and the effect of it is that you start to notice the collective lessons of their lives. One of the clearest is that relationships and marriage are not as easily defined as the bishops might think.
Some of the early biographies are the most enlightening in this regard. The earliest is from around 2400BC and tells the story of Khnumhotep and Niankhkhnum, whose tomb was uncovered in Egypt in 1962. Not only were the two men buried together, carvings in the tomb show them embracing, holding hands and staring into each other's eyes. They may have been friends, they may have been brothers, they may have been in a same-sex relationship. The point is that it doesn't matter – what the story seems to show is that the boundaries between affection, intimacy, sexuality and commitment that the bishops seek to nail down and keep in place, are much more adjustable and changeable than they realise, or would want.
On the question of marriage, some of the other biographies in the book are even clearer. The biography of the 17th-century Chinese poet Chen Weisong, who lived with another man, Xu Ziyun, includes the fact that male marriages were celebrated in the province of Fujian. Ceremonies were also devised by the Eastern Church for joining two men together in rituals that were remarkably similar to weddings.
In other words, the religious critics of gay marriage can argue that only Christian traditions should apply in Britain, but they cannot argue that for thousands of years marriage has only ever been defined one way.
It would be wrong, however, to reduce Gay Life Stories to a mere rebuttal of the arguments against gay marriage because it is more interesting than that. Many of the stories have a heroic element – particularly those of the French writer Andre Gide, the Victorian landowner Anne Lister, and the poet Edward Carpenter – and that is needed to balance the stories that inevitably have tragic elements: violence, Aids, homophobia.
Aldrich's writing helps to maintain this balance as well as bringing out another important point: not all gay people are the same shape and size as the popular stereotypes. There are different social and personal experiences, different political approaches, and gay men and women are called to a whole range of professions. Most of Gay Life Stories demonstrates this, but particularly the story of the French general Hubert Lyautey. Now that so many Western countries have ended their ban on gays in the military, men and women in a similar position to Lyautey no longer have to hide. If we get a new edition of Gay Life Stories in 100 years, it may well contain many more soldiers.
But what of the 4000 years the book actually covers? What do they prove? Probably that, even though some countries have gone from tolerance to intolerance, the direction of travel on gay equality is, on the whole, forward. There is more acceptance, more openness; there is a brighter light.
Gay Life Stories
Robert Aldrich
Thames & Hudson, £19.95
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article