THERE are many ways to conclude a festival.
Having your floor submerged under several inches of water, as happened before the Cottier Chamber Project's final concert during Friday's monsoon, is a strikingly novel, if wetly-climactic, way of rounding things off, though it was well mopped-up by the time the audience arrived.
Last year, host group Daniel's Beard brought things to a roaring conclusion with the music of Dohnanyi. This year they took a different tack, concluding the three-week festival with a performance of Schubert's Octet, a comprehensive, multi-movement masterpiece, running at an hour, but a masterpiece that speaks intimately rather than through rhetorical or dramatic pronouncement.
And, in a somewhat less than totally polished performance, it came across as rather less than the sum of its parts. Schubert's Octet tends to be seen as a sort of sibling to Beethoven's Septet. But where the Beethoven, despite the composer's deep self-doubt about the piece, brims with energy and impulsiveness, Schubert's Octet is a more serene animal, exquisitely polished and graceful at all levels of its composition. Fine; but that grace, poise and refinement need to be reflected in the performance.
And Friday's performance by the string and wind players of Daniel's Beard, though it included many fine representations of elements in the Octet, not least the detail and character of the great Variations movement, failed to reflect the veneer and sheen of the supremely-refined surface of the music.
Anyway, we need to tease: so, following a hugely successful Year Two, with big names, big groups and big stars, what does the Cottier Chamber Project promise for next year? Watch this space.
HHH
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article