If this is Shakespeare, tho' possibly not as regular enthusiasts know it, then the same is true of Wee Stories.
The company, now under the direction of Iain Johnstone, is in transition and this Dream, aimed at ages 10 and over, is something of a new departure from the old house style (and on-stage partnership of Johnstone and former director Andy Cannon).
Johnstone himself is not actually performing and you may have thought his flair for numpty antics would have made him a shoo-in for Bottom. But there's no Bottom either. Johnstone's adaptation of the original Shakespeare dispenses with the Mechanicals altogether, paring back the intertwining plot-lines (and text) to focus on the quartet of lovers and their encounters with the meddlesome forces of the fairy realm in the midnight-midsummer wood.
The production mixes in a liberal use of puppets, not so surprising since there are only four of a bright young cast to play lovers, fairies and Hermia's tyrannical old dad. He fetches up as the ass, ears attached to his bowler hat, in yet another nicely handled characterisation by Andrew Rothney, whose ability to speak Shakespeare's lines as written makes you wish there wasn't quite so much well-intentioned tinkering. Less witchy-cackling from Tommy Mullins as Puck would be good too, but he – along with Samantha Blaney, Belle Jones and Rothney – plunges into the business of quick changes, puppetry, singing and story-telling with an energy that does much to offset the odd hippy/flower child look of the set and costumes. It's a fitful dream, but there are moments where the old Wee Stories finesse shines through.
At Cumbernauld Theatre tomorrow and then on tour across Scotland
HHH
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article