Just to get it out of the way, I must confess to finding the over-fed "Britain v Germany" conceit underpinning this concert immediately irksome.
It was unnecessary and regrettable, particularly when extended to the notion of the performance as "musical football match", and calling upon the audience to vote for a "winner" at the end. Strip all that nonsense away and you were simply left with a perfectly enjoyable evening of interesting music.
There is much to like about the group's refreshing approach and their choice of programme here was admirably wide-ranging, with a gratifying buoyancy and directness to their performance. Walton's Sonata For Strings was a lovely opener, with the ensemble (under leader Jonathan Morton's energetic direction) maintaining excellent rhythmic tightness in the scurrying outer movements whilst fully conveying the wistful melancholy of the central Lento section.
To follow was a superb rendition of Martin Suckling's four Short Stories "postcards" - sublimely conceived mini-masterpieces whose dense yet somehow delicate, fragile construction was painstakingly rendered with marvellously sustained intensity.
The second half opened with Leopold Hurt's darkly playful Dead Reckoning - another exercise in textural variety, plaintive shards of dissonance jostling with haunting drones and warped sea shanties - and all played with inspiring assurance.
To close was Brahms's String Quintet No. 2, here expanded by Morton to accommodate 16 performers, resulting in a pleasingly orchestral sound that felt entirely appropriate to the composer's lush romantic melodies. With the concert over, we came to the inevitable vote - in which I abstained, the only obvious "winner" being great music beautifully performed, which joyfully exists outwith all national boundaries.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article