It is a week since the tragic death of Philip Seymour Hoffman, whose sudden, premature absence from our film-going still does not bear thinking about.
Much has been written about how Hoffman was a character actor who became a star, someone who was not fast-tracked to fame by his looks but became pre-eminent through the depth and versatility of his work.
In contrast, Matthew McConaughey has taken a long time overcoming speedy success and the subsequent pigeon-holing that his Adonis-level handsomeness brought upon him. Early promise in films such as Richard Linklater's stoner comedy Dazed And Confused and John Sayles's Texas drama Lone Star gave way to a stream of forgettable romcom twaddle, such as The Wedding Planner and the aptly named Failure To Launch.
McConaughey has spoken, graciously, of how he stepped back for a year until someone offered him something serious to work in. It paid off. Now he is beginning to show the danger, the range, the consistent acting chops that we expected from Hoffman. And after the creepy cop-cum-hitman of Killer Joe, the buff male stripper of Magic Mike, the good-natured escaped convict of Mud, and the epitome of poor role modeling in The Wolf Of Wall Street, comes the icing on the cake.
In Dallas Buyers Club, McConaughey plays Ron Woodroof, the real-life Texas electrician, rodeo cowboy and all-round bad apple who contracted HIV in 1985 and became - quite against character - a champion for the rights of Aids sufferers. When we first see Woodroof he is embroiled in a threesome during a rodeo, a clue to the sexual abandon that has made him prey to the HIV virus. He is 35, but looks 50, and unaware there is anything wrong with him.
Woodroof is not a nice guy. He is a hustler, a gambler and a typical Southern bigot. With his Stetson, shades and handlebar moustache, he would not be out of place in The Village People, but if you told him that he would probably knock you out. A minor work injury takes him into hospital. Once there he is quickly diagnosed, but refuses to believe it. The doctors give him 30 days to live. Woodroof's trailer-trash friends take no time in ostracising him, just as he would them.
He sets to reading about the virus in the library, and the moment that he finally accepts what is happened to him is, understandably, one of the film's most powerful moments. We now see a different Woodroof - the fighter, smart and resourceful, if still happy to break the law, using illicit means to wrangle a supply of the controversial AZT - the only drug approved for trials at that time. When AZT makes him worse, he investigates affordable, alternative treatments whose effects are infinitely better. He smells a business opportunity, and the buyers club is born.
If this was not a true story, one might condemn the contrivance. As it is, Woodroof really did take on the establishment that was pandering to the pharmaceutical companies, self-interest turned to a sort of civic duty, and the scoundrel became a likeable rogue, whose genuine friendship with Rayon (Jared Leto), a transsexual drug addict, gives the film its poignant heartbeat.
Leto's performance, like McConaughey's, is without affectation but deeply affecting. Yet we have seen Rayon before; Woodroof is a one-off. McConaughey shed 38lbs for the role, but the skeletal transformation would be nothing without the attitude - the caustic defiance, the humour, the incremental development of integrity in a man who would "prefer to die with my boots on".
With a story like this, served by a fine script, this may well have been a film worth watching anyway. But McConaughey makes it unmissable.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article