The Mousetrap
The Mousetrap
Theatre Royal, Glasgow
Neil Cooper
Sixty-two years is a frightfully long time to keep a secret. Where Agatha Christie's evergreen whodunnit is concerned, however, keeping schtumm has transformed an inter-audience conspiracy into a global institution that not even social media and the internet has betrayed.
With this in mind, there will be no spoiler alerts in what follows, except to say that, in its depiction of how cruelly children can be treated, this touring production that first flew its London coop two years ago looks oddly current.
Set in a mansion turned guest house just opened by the increasingly furtive Mollie and Giles Ralston, these refugees from the big city find themselves fully booked with a house full of guests seeking shelter from the storm, all of whom come clad in regulation dark overcoat, muffler and face-concealing fedoras.
A murder has been committed in town, and, according to the game Sergeant Trotter, who skis into this TripAdvisor nightmare in waiting, every one of this pot-pourri of eccentrics, busybodies and mysterious men and women with pasts may be involved.
It is far too flip to be the best of Christie's canon, and is somewhat understandably all played rather archly in veteran Mousetrap director Ian Watt-Smith's production (he also directed it in its 38th, 41st, 58th and 59th years).
A set of energetic performances expose the twisted nerves of each character as it is made explicit exactly how they came to be damaged in such a way. It is this mix of pop psychology with a common touch that has kept generations of Christie devotees complicit in the play's conceit for six decades.
But shh. It is far too late to give the game away now.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article