Aye Write!
Book Festival
Mitchell Library, Glasgow
Lesley McDowell
Alexander McCall Smith in conversation with Stuart Kelly
Roy Foster: Vivid Faces, The Revolutionary Generation in Ireland 1890-1923
Julian Spalding: Realisation, The Origins of Art
Kevin Bridges: The Books That Made Me
Ben Okri: The Age of Magic
Given his own genteel brand of satire about vegans, crime writers, pushy mothers and anyone else who catches his eye, Alexander McCall Smith will surely forgive any critic who observes that there was a touch of the Morningside Matrons to his complaints about a lack of manners in today's society. It was, needless to say, exactly what his audience wanted to hear from the man who so recently penned an updated version of Jane Austen's Emma, another writer who had a great deal to say about manners, both false and real ones.
But I doubt the revolutionary women in pre-civil war Ireland concerned themselves too much with behaving properly. On the most lively day of the festival, Roy Foster's superb talk on those young men and women who campaigned for social justice and believed that revolution in Ireland would bring it about, only to be let down by the conservative society that followed it, was both inspiring and a warning about the potential for failure in all political movements. Their diaries explored Freud and desire, as well as political aims, and have been suppressed, he argued, in the aftermath which sought to present a different view of the 'saints and martyrs' of the revolution ('Young men,' he observed drily, 'who came from the country to shoot at policemen, were not interested in their sexual feelings').
How far we have developed as human beings can be traced in art form the earliest cave paintings to the architectural marvels of today, Julian Spalding (pictured) argued in a wide-ranging and occasionally meandering talk. He did apologise for wandering off at tangents, but given that he spoke without notes and his subject could hardly be greater, he may be excused. His eschewing of such images in his presentation might have been a mistake, though: he has a great deal of insight into work like the Sistine Chapel and The Scream and photographs might have helped anchor the greater flights taken by his talk.
No such flights of fancy with the effortlessly funny and always down-to-earth Kevin Bridges, who cited Fever Pitch, Trainspotting, Fight Cub, Catcher in the Rye and Frank Skinner's autobiography as books that "made me". No surprises there, perhaps, as they tend to speak to a need to come to terms with a masculinity that can be more hampering than it is helpful, and which show ways to deal with it, but Bridges was both frank and perceptive about what he gleaned from these books, as a schoolboy who suffered anxiety attacks and a teenager who could easily have ended up drifting and unhappy.
Ben Okri acknowledged that we hardly seem to be living in "an age of magic" as the title of his latest book would suggest, but stressed the importance of "looking beneath". The surface of the age, he said, is not the real representation of the age. Underneath, there's something quite special that we're rarely aware of. In his view that a single headline shouldn't define an individual he was close to what Alexander McCall Smith had called attention to on Friday night, when he said that people were often condemned by one wrong act, and he also echoed McCall Smith on more positive views of Africa. It's a lazy view of the Continent, he said, to respond only to the headlines about famine and abduction, in novels. He made a demand rather than a plea for slower reading, for taking the time to read properly, and that's why the first chapter of his book is only one sentence. Distilled from an original two-and-a-half pages, it was all that was needed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article