Music
RSNO Chamber Ensemble, Cottier's Theatre, Glasgow
Michael Tumelty
Four stars
THERE is a never-ending discussion about why Schubert left so many works only partially-completed, a good one for pub talk. Even better, however, that some of these torsos (if that's what they are) have found a life in the concert hall and on disc.
It was rewarding to hear two of them, the single-movement B flat Major String Trio, and the one completed movement of D703, the famous Quartettsatz, so lightly and melodically-played on a warm Sunday afternoon in Cottier's with players from the RSNO bringing an airy quality to the Trio, and a genuinely restless, dramatic rustling to the Quartettsatz.
Then the group bigged-up to six, and quite a line-up, with leader Maya Iwabuchi, principal second violin, Xander van Vliet, violists Tom Dunn (principal) and Francesca Hunt, with cellists Alexei Kiseliov (principal) and Betsy Taylor in a very fine performance of Brahms' First String Sextet that will be remembered for a long time.
There was a secret to the great success of this performance, and it was to do with weight and momentum. Brahms is a genuine heavyweight, of course, but I've heard too many performances which seem to apply that quality literally and physically, with the result that some pages of the piece can sound over-weighty, laboured and, at worst, bogged down. (For many years, as a young man, I loathed Brahms, for these very qualities: and they weren't his!)
The RSNO players' performance had a superb sense of balance between top and bottom of the texture, translucence around the viola lines, and a gently well-sprung rhythm, with a buoyant momentum. It never dragged; I loved it.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article