Theatre
Hamlet
Barbican Theatre, London
Carole Woddis
*** (three stars)
After all the hullabaloo, is it possible for a performer to live up to the hype? Has the Bard fallen prey to rank commercialism?
Well, Shakespeare was nothing if not a shrewd businessman. And this Sonia Friedman-Sky Arts Hamlet, `starring’ Benedict Cumberbatch, with its £10 daily ticket scheme and devoted Sherlock fan base must have repaid its investment in publicity ten times over.
But what of the production? Lyndsey Turner whose previous hits have included the multi-award winning Chimerica and Posh has delivered a spectacular, almost cinematic visual feast, somewhere between a Hapsburg Empire in melt-down and WW1 meets Beckettian desolation. Modern and yet Ruritanian – a bit like our own dear monarchy. Es Devlin’s grandiose opener of vast dining hall dominated by family portraits and sweeping staircase makes clear this is a play about private feelings played out, uncomfortably, in very public spaces. By the end, the outer external world has literally invaded the inner, court corruption made manifest by mounds of earth piled up at every entrance. Visually stunning if slightly mad.
But then madness, feigned or otherwise, is at the heart of Hamlet, the great philosophical meditation on indecision, self-doubt and our mortality. Cumberbatch makes a dashing toy soldier, Nat King Cole loving rebel who even administers the poison himself in the Gonzago play-acting scene.
But in truth, his is not an interpretation that goes very deep. There is little evidence of internal journeying from agonised soul-searching to ultimate resolution. Charismatic, be-jeaned, Cumberbatch is just too deft, too sharp. Around him, a heavy-weight cast try but fail to make any discernible impression. A compendium of talents, gone to waste.
Needless to say, he was cheered to the rafters. Job done.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here