Festival Music
Emerson String Quartet
Queen’s Hall, Edinburgh
Michael Tumelty
five stars
NO pretence, no showmanship and definitely no playing to the gallery. I could name string quartets that do all of these things; and unlike some listeners I don’t resent it: I’ve never objected to a bit of fun in music-making. But yesterday’s ultra-classy set of Queen’s Hall performances by the American Emerson String Quartet, with its “new-ish” cellist, the Welsh musician of some two years membership in the group, Paul Watkins, and a man well-known in these parts, was in a league apart.
The sheer quality of ensemble playing from the Emersons, with Watkins seamlessly integrated into the group, while retaining his characterful playing style and profile, was almost miraculous to hear. They have this way of getting right under the skin of a piece without imposing themselves on it: there was never a doubt that what we heard yesterday was Schubert, Haydn and Tchaikovsky, as opposed to the composers’ music filtered through the performers’ imaginations. It’s almost as though the group liberates the truth of the music from the score. Never have I heard such beautiful frailty in Schubert’s Rosamunde Quartet. And that one, moreover, was a performance that called out for a broader sweep of outings for Schubert’s under-exposed canon of quartets.
Haydn’s D major Quartet from the opus 76 set required a boat load of adjectives to capture the wit, grace and sheer humanity the Emersons released from the pages of this characterful music, while adjectives alone could come nowhere near accounting for the stupendously-honest and heart-stirring account of Tchaikovsky’s Third String Quartet from this great group in a memorable concert.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here