Festival Music
Academy of St Martin in the Fields
Usher Hall
Martin Kershaw
three stars
WATCHING this concert rather put me in mind of the Reginald Perrin episode where he goes out to lunch and repeatedly orders ravioli. “I came here for a balanced three course meal: ravioli, ravioli, ravioli” he insists to the protesting waiter. Reggie is losing the plot – no-one in their right mind would order three courses of the same thing, but this is basically what the Academy of St Martin in the Fields served up to the Usher Hall audience on Thursday night.
First course – Mendelssohn’s Overture to a Midsummer Night’s Dream: pleasant, solid Late Classical/Early Romantic fare with plenty of familiar melodies. Second course – Bruch Scottish Fantasy, admittedly written 40 years or so later, but other than that, see above. Third course – Beethoven Pastoral Symphony: see above.
All were played perfectly well, but it was too much of the same thing. I came to dread the inevitability of those manicured cadences, the obsessively repeated phrases, the sheer relentless consonance of it all. Even the Pastoral Symphony’s storm section seemed tame and cliched – its swirling diminished sevenths barely making a puddle.
It certainly wasn’t for lack of effort on the part of director Joshua Bell, lurching and swaying about on his leader’s piano stool, but there simply wasn’t enough variety in the material to create the required impact. And whilst his playing in the Bruch was virtuosic and fluent as ever, the piece itself is little more than a reasonable orchestration of some Scottish tunes – distinctly average. It’s a shame, because Bell is a truly great violinist and the Academy is a world-class ensemble, but both were let down here by criminally unimaginative programming.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here