Dance
Life Is A Dream
Festival Theatre, Edinburgh
Mary Brennan
***
“To sleep, perchance to dream – ay, there’s the rub...” Hamlet’s apprehension – and indeed his living nightmares – inspired choreographer Kim Brandstrup over a decade ago.
Now the troubling dream-legacy of sleep re-emerges in his response to Calderon’s play, Life Is A Dream (c 1635), in which an incarcerated Polish prince can never be certain if his brief day of freedom was indeed a visceral plunge into flesh and blood excesses... or just a fantastical wish projection.
Brandstrup’s new full-length choreography for Rambert, however, is not a literal rendition of the play. Instead, he embraces dreaming as a journey into those innermost urges and questions usually kept unspoken.
So it is that, in a dimly-lit rehearsal studio, a director falls asleep and conjures up aspects of the Calderon scenes he’s been working on – and in doing so explores aspects of his own identity through a fictitious prince beset by wild, free-fall imaginings.
For audiences, Act One is a maelstrom of incidents where certainties are elusive. As Lutoslawski’s music, played live, shifts dramatically between extremes of mood, so significant characters are assumed by more than one dancer and even the white-shirted director has a doppelganger.
The dingy set harbours deceptive shadows while the Quay Brothers’ projections are mirages of a natural world denied to those caught up in the monochrome kaleidoscope of encounters.
Confusing? Assuredly so.
Does Act Two resolve anything? Only if you abandon thoughts of a linear narrative and surrender to the confrontational intensity between the director’s two selves – Liam Francis and Miguel Altunaga -– as they wrestle to grasp what might, or might not be, the reality of who they are.
Holly Waddington’s clever costumes crossover timelines metaphysical soul-searching is as much the fabric of Calderon’s 17th century as it is Brandstrup’s current choreography, the latter sparked with restless agility, sudden elegance and high-flying lifts that the Rambert dancers deliver, for real, with bravura finesse.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here