Music
BBC SSO/Feddeck
City Halls, Glasgow
Keith Bruce
four stars
PRIZE-winning young American conductor James Feddeck has appeared with some of the top orchestras of the world, including the RSNO last year, but I am sure as many of the very full house on Thursday evening were there to hear soloist James Ehnes, who had been a regular visitor to Scotland since he charmed Orkney’s St Magnus Festival many years ago now.
From the point of view of Scotland’s experience of him, this was a fascinating concert during which he was on imperious form for the Britten Violin Concerto, which the composer tinkered with throughout his life after its New York premiere in 1940. It was preceded by Samuel Barber’s contemporaneous Second Essay for Orchestra – and Ehnes memorably performed Barber’s Violin Concerto with the Scottish Chamber Orchestra over a decade ago. The two works are interesting companion pieces, for the debt both owe to Russian composers earlier in the 20th century, and in the idiosyncratic use of certain instruments, particularly brass and clarinets in the Barber and tuba and piccolos in the Britten. It was also a treat to hear the unmistakable tone of Stella McCracken’s oboe in the concerto.
The box office success of the programme, however, was surely down to the presence of Gustav Holst’s Planets suite in the second half, and the orchestra’s guests stole the show there as well. Chorus-master Andrew Nunn’s Royal Scottish Conservatoire-derived Les Sirenes provided the off-stage chorus of the mystical Neptune at the conclusion of the work from the first floor foyer, fading out as if they were strolling off down Candleriggs, and were rightly cheered to the rafters for their contribution. It is the final detail in a work full that is also full of captivating orchestral detail, which Feddeck brought out with fine attention. As in the Britten, however, his tempi sometimes seemed a little laboured in the effort. Old age comes more quickly than Saturn did here – and, to paraphrase G K Chesterton, perhaps Nunn’s angels can fly because they take themselves lightly.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here