Bodyguard creator Jed Mercurio has admitted that both he and star Keeley Hawes did “milk it” when fans speculated that her character might not really be dead.
The bombing in the third episode, which killed her character Julia Montague, the Home Secretary, was a surprise twist and prompted fans to guess that her character might have secretly survived.
After Newsnight asked viewers for questions for Mercurio on Twitter, Hawes responded: “Is Julia Montague alive…?”
Speaking at the BFI & Radio Times Television Festival, Mercurio said: “It was something that did take us by surprise, Keeley as well.
“We were quite overwhelmed by the theories that were coming out.
“And we I suppose we did milk it, there were lot of tweets between us but we were texting each other at the same time to keep each other in the loop.”
Asked if he did consider that option, Mercurio said: “Of course, there were only really two outcomes.
“We examine everything, there certainly was that discussion.”
He added: “There was definitely intentional ambiguity and she doesn’t die in that scene, she survives and goes to hospital.
“The choice was that it was instant or there was something to play with dramatically and we thought it was better to have that ambiguity.”
Mercurio said he also considered showing her death on scene but said: “It was purely about the point of view and I think we are all familiar with some shows where you are thinking ‘How is that person witnessing that?’
“If we were staying true to David Budd’s point of view there was no circumstance he would have been allowed in.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article