Dunedin Consort
Queen’s Hall, Edinburgh
Keith Bruce
four stars
THE Dunedin Consort’s Messiah is a much more organic beast at the end of 2019, more than a decade on from the release of the ensemble’s award-winning Linn recording of John Butt’s reconstruction of the first performance in Dublin. Although a home gig at this time of year is becoming as much of an institution as the Edinburgh Royal Choral Union’s venerable New Year Messiah in the Usher Hall, hearing the work with just a dozen singers and fifteen instrumentalists is, of course, a very different experience, and one in which the Third Part, following the Nativity and Passion of Jesus with the most persuasive musical argument for one of the most difficult tenets of Christianity, can still have the visceral impact Handel and his librettist Charles Jennens intended.
Alongside Butt, directing from the harpsichord, tenor Nicholas Mulroy was the other front-line link with the recording, a slight nasal quality to his voice suggesting he was not fully fit, but still singing powerfully through any ailment. Bass Roland Wood had succumbed to illness, however, and was ably replaced by Marcus Farnsworth at very short notice, his Trumpet Shall Sound in that triumphant third part ending with a fine flourish.
It is tempting to deploy a sporting comparison for the way this team of vocalists worked together, with those who step out for the solos the strikers, and the chorus in midfield and defence roles. The other goal-scorers here were soprano Rachel Redmond, whose I know that my Redeemer liveth was a bar-setting reading, and the superb alto Jess Dandy, so incredibly rich and persuasive from But who may abide and He was despised.
It is not just the singers, but also the fine continuo players, and pitch-perfect baroque strings, led by Huw Daniel, who all have distinct, audible and individual contributions to make in a Dunedin Consort performance of Handel’s masterpiece: it has become emblematic of a successful community enterprise.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here