TALKS between merchant bankers Warburgs, representing unhappy Gateway
institutional investors and the Gateway chairman Alec Monk, aimed at
agreeing terms for a leveraged buy-out, broke down yesterday afternoon
and this promptly led to the launch of a 195p per share cash offer for
Gateway worth #1735m.
The bid is being made by a specially created company called Isosceles
financed to the tune of #200m of equity by Mercury Asset Management,
Globe Investement Trust, 3i and Murray Johnstone.
On top of this, a group of major banks are putting up #1155m of senior
debt and GE Capital Corporate Finance Group along with Standard
Chartered Bank and 3i Group are putting up #375m of so-called mezzanine
debt facilities. Furthermore, financing is being made available for the
working capital.
The fact that a bid is being made for Gateway, which is one of
Britain's biggest but also one of its least successful food retailing
groups, comes as no surprise. Indeed the lack of surprise, as shownby
the movement in the share price, suggests that there could be work for
the Takeover Panel and the Council of the Stock Exchange.
Just over a year ago, institutional investors rallied round Mr Monk in
sufficient strength to defeat the 220p a share bid launched by Barker &
Dobson.
Seemingly the hope was that Mr Monk would quickly learn his lesson and
change his strategy. But he has soldiered on as before and last year
profits fell from #195m to #186m and the group's broker BZW is only
forecasting #196m for the current year.
So a group of institutional holders have had enough and have
essentially decided that Barker & Dobson had the right idea a year ago.
The immediate plan, if the offer is successful, is to sell 70 to 80
superstores and an agreement has already been drawn up to sell 62 of
these to the Asda Group for #705m in cash. If this goes through it will
make Asda the third biggest group in UK food retailing.
Then the group will set about selling the US company Herman's Sporting
Goods as well as the Medicare business and will then get down to the
business of extracting an acceptable profit out of the core retailing
business which at the moment is at the bottom of the league in terms of
sales per square foot and operating profits.
The new company Isoceles is chaired by Ernest Sharp who in his time
has been a joint managing director of GrandMet and a director of House
of Fraser. Chief exceutive is David Smith a former partner in Arthur
Young and a specialist in corporate restructurings and acquisitions.
Quite clearly Isosceles hopes that Gateway managers will stay aboard
and respond to the incentive schemes that will be made available to
them.
There have already been discussions with Iain Wolsey who could no
longer work with Mr Monk and resigned as marketing director of Gateway
Foodmarkets last August. He in turn introduced Mr Smith to four
disillusioned key members of the Gateway Foodmarkets management --
Robert Willett the marketing director, Richard Quinton the finance
director, Roger Reeson, managing director of Fresh Foods and Peter
Fisher, Corporate Affairs director.
Because of their part in the intrigue and their lack of loyalty these
gentlemen were suspended from their duties yesterday. But if the
Isosceles bid succeeds they are apparently assured of key jobs in the
revamped operation.
The cash offer of 195p is 40% above the low point reached just before
Christmas and just before the January surge of speculative buying of
Gateway shares. It is also 18% above the average for the month of March
and 10% above last Friday's price.
Moreover, the fact that the Gateway price only rose by a further
21!/;1/p to 1871!/;1/p in late dealings yesterday suggests that the
market has no great expectations that someone is going to come in with a
higher bid.
But it also suggests no great conviction that this consortium bid will
win the day. Although key members of his senior management team have
behaved with extreme disloyalty, Alec Monk who was consulting with his
merchant bankers Morgan Grenfell and Lazards is not dead in the water
yet.
The institutions who have got together to plan this enterprise only
own 4.4% of the issued capital. This pales in comparison with the 15%
owned by AB Foods who received their shares as part consideration when
they sold their Finefare chain to Alec Monk. The consortium said
yesterday that it has not discussed the matter with AB Foods and AB
Foods was not prepraed to offer any comment on the situation last night.
Observers were left to conclude yesterday that price was the major
factor in the breakdown of the talks between Alec Monk and the
consortium. On Monday the group stated that 195p a share was derisory
and group finance director Alan Perleman used the word again yesterday.
He said: ''We said that when they first started to talk about it and
we say it again. It is not a sufficient price to win the day''. He also
said that the four suspended Foodmarkets directors had notifid chief
executive Louis Sherwood of their involvement on Monday and were told to
leave the building immediately. Mr Perleman, who desribed their action
as ''not a satisfactory way of repaying trust'' said ''we are
considering our position. They might carry valuable information''.
However, although Isosceles said last night that it will be quite
happy to renew the discussisons with Mr Monk, it was anxious to give the
impression that the price was not negotiable. But it would say that,
wouldn't it.
When the formal offer comes out it will offer shareholders the
alternative of taking part of their consideration in a Convertible
Redeemable loan note which will give shareholders the opportunity to
retain a stake in Isoceles when it is returned to the public forum in
three to five years after the restructuring has been completed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article