MARGARET Thatcher has got one, and so have Mikhail Gorbachev and Tom
Jones. Thanks to perestroika thousands of ordinary Russians will soon
have them.
Aberdeen woollen cloth manufacturers Crombie have won a major order
from the Soviet Union which will enable their citizens to keep the chill
out with the world famous coats.
Russia's ''top 10,000'' are well acquainted with the sombre
triple-thickness cloth produced on the banks of the River Don, but now
the reconstruction of the country's economy means every Boris, Ivan or
Sasha will have the opportunity to buy a Crombie.
Even though their trading link with Russia spans more than a century,
Crombie were taken aback at the size of the order which, at a time of
difficulty in the trade, has guaranteed the jobs of their workers
throughout this year.
The quality and durability of Crombie has made it popular in Russia
among the Politburo and other elite members of society since the first
ties were forged in 1880.
Chernobyl proved a major blow for Crombie because the nuclear tragedy
left no money available for the purchase of imported cloth and a
significant percentage of their turnover was lost.
In the past two years the Russian order has been restored but the #4m
contract just confirmed was more than they could have hoped for.
Managing director Mr Ronnie Lamb claims the route he had to follow in
five months of negotiations dealing through Belgium was more tortuous
than anything encountered by Indiana Jones, and says his success was
largely due to perestroika.
''There has been so little for the ordinary people to buy in Russia
for so long that their disposable income is high and the Soviets are
determined to show that perestroika works, in the short term, by getting
consumer goods on the shelves,'' he said. ''They will be able to afford
what are regarded as luxurious items.''
Last year's order from Russia would have made 20,000 overcoats. This
year's provides enough cloth for 100,000.
The order is in two parts with 190,000 metres going to Eastern Bloc
mills to be tailored into coats and 20,000 going direct to Russia for
the top people to pick their own lengths. These will then be sent to
Savile Row for tailoring because although the cloth is always the same
marled grey they like to keep up with the London styles.
Russia is in fact one of the few places where Crombie cloth is still
sent to be converted into coats. Since 1985 Crombie have preferred to
manufacture everything made from their cloth themselves.
To prevent the exploitation of their name by a few they stopped
supplies and invested millions in producing a full range of ladies and
gents clothing which are made in their own factory in England.
''The Crombie name was being prostituted and degraded,'' said Mr Lamb.
''The quality of manufacture of the garments was not up to the standards
we would have expected. Now the only garments on sale in Britian and
North America which bear the Crombie label will be those made by us. No
longer will people be able to turn a silk purse into a sow's ear.''
The Crombie name has been synonymous with quality since the company
was started by a canny Scot in 1805. To maintain the standards hi-tech
changes have been rejected and traditional techniques have been
maintained in many parts of the factory, although at least one old
process has been eliminated, to the immense relief of the staff -- and
probably Crombie wearers.
Early this century it was decided to abandon the urine scour. Buckets
of urine were bought at 1!/;1/d and mixed with much more expensive
pigs' dung at 1s a bucket, bullocks blood, ammonia and soap. This method
of scouring, which apparently speeded up the felting, was dropped when
soap became more economical and when flush systems were introduced in
toilets which diluted the main ingredient.
What does remain is the puzzle of how this scouring method evolved in
the first place.
The secret of Crombie quality, say the management, lies in the
finishing and there have been few changes in that over the past 184
years, although in 1805 no one had to remove meticulously the flecks of
polypropylene which infiltrate the raw cashmere from the sacks in which
it is carried from the Himalayan peaks.
It appears in the cloth as tiny white threads which are individually
plucked out by tweezers.
Crombie can boast some illustrious customers from royalty to armies.
During the First World War they made millions of yards of great coating,
serge, khaki and flannel. In the Second World War they produced 467
miles of cloth a year including the cloth for overcoats for 90,450
soldiers, 23,364 naval and RAF officers, 12,042 US Army officers and
142,042 civilians in 1943.
Their most unusual order came the previous year for a special shade of
dark grey for Norwegians being sent back home to organise resistance.
Another ''grey'' they produced was for the Confederate Army during the
American Civil War.
Crombie, it seems, will go to any length to get their order through.
In 1870 they used a hot air balloon to get one to Paris as the French
capital was under siege by the Prussians.
Mr Lamb, who claims that after five months of negotiations the
Russians now speak fluent Aberdonian, is leaving the company he joined
as an apprentice loom tuner 26 years ago at the age of 15 to take up a
new challenge in America.
He has been appointed vice-president of Amicale Industries in New York
who manufacture rare and exotic fabrics, including cashmere, camelhair,
alpaca and angora.
He will be reluctant to leave the mill, which has become a major
tourist attraction in Aberdeen since the opening of a visitors' centre,
but departs having secured one of the biggest orders since John Crombie
started the business in 1805 which made his name a household one.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article