From STELLA BUGGE,
The Senja, Wednesday.
THE skipper of a Norwegian coastguard ship which rescued hundreds of
passengers from a stricken Soviet cruise liner said today that the
Maksim Gorkiy was travelling much too fast when it smashed into a belt
of Arctic ice.
''I don't know the exact speed but I was told by crew on board that it
had a speed of between 14 and 17 knots at the time of the accident,''
Sigurd Kleiven, commander of the coastguard vessel Senja, told a news
conference aboard his ship.
Asked how fast he would have been going in such foggy conditions with
drifting ice around, he replied: ''Between two and three knots.''
None of the 990 people aboard the 25,000-ton Soviet liner was hurt in
the accident in the early hours of yesterday. The 611 passengers, most
of them elderly West Germans, were flown home today.
Kleiven said that contrary to earlier reports, the Maksim Gorkiy had
not hit an iceberg but had blundered into a huge belt of drift ice about
eight feet thick, two nautical miles wide and 12 to 15 miles long.
''We saw no icebergs in the area,'' he said.
The Senja had to plough through the same barrier of ice to reach the
damaged ship and rescue passengers, hundreds of whom had taken refuge in
lifeboats or on ice floes.
Crew still aboard the Maksim Gorkiy succeeded in stabilising the ship
and patching up the two gashes in its bow opened by the ice.
The liner was sailing slowly today under its own power towards the
Soviet settlement of Barentsburg on the Arctic island of Spitzbergen
with about half its crew aboard.
0 In Duesseldorf, a West German tourist today described how passengers
and crew members from the liner used poles to nudge away drifting ice
floes that could have splintered their lifeboat like a twig.
''After we were lowered to the sea with about 100 other passengers and
crew and moved away from the ship, we found ourselves in the middle of
pack ice with no other boats in sight,'' recalled Ludwig Pfeilschifter.
''The fear was just palpable in the boat: you could see it in our
pallor, and some of us thought we were looking death in the eyes,'' said
Pfeilschifter, who spent five-and-a-half hours in the open lifeboat
before being rescued by the Norwegian coast guard vessel Senja.
''If the Senja hadn't happened so close by, if the sea hadn't been so
calm and if it hadn't been for the (Arctic) midnight sun, our situation
would have become a catastrophe,'' said his wife Maria.
More than 570 cruise passengers were emotionally reunited with
relatives in West Germany after flying in from Spitzbergen.
Some of the passengers who arrived on a chartered jet in Duesseldorf
assembled with the tour group's priest in the airport lounge to say the
Lord's Prayer, while others fought off exhaustion to tell their stories.
Maria Pfeilschifter described how after they had drifted in the ice
for hours, Soviet crew members ordered her group to climb onto a large
ice floe because they felt it would be safer there until help came.
''We thought it was all over then,'' she said, adding that blankets
and planks from deckchairs were placed on the floe to reduce the chances
of slipping and breaking through the ice.
The group was saved shortly afterward by the coast guard ship.
Other passengers said there was no panic after the Maksim Gorkiy
rammed the ice pack and that the evacuation mounted by Soviet crew
members was generally efficient and professional.
But they complained of what followed -- terrifying hours spent in
freezing fog aboard lifeboats ringed by shifting pack ice without any
sign of rescuers.
Dozens of people in one lifeboat had to endure an experience almost as
harrowing as fending off the pack ice.
''For some reason, our lifeboat was not lowered all the way to the
water surface. We just hung from the cables for four hours, banging
against the ship's hull like a roller coaster,'' said passenger Werner
Jahn, 76.--Reuter.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article