BONN, Wednesday
CHANCELLOR Helmut Kohl discussed German unification tonight with East
German conservative leaders who won a resounding victory in their
country's first free elections.
Government sources said Mr Kohl's late-night talks in Bonn with East
German Christian Democratic (CDU) leader Mr Lothar de Maiziere and other
conservative politicians concentrated on new laws needed to implement
currency, economic and social union.
Chancellery Minister Mr Rudolf Seiters told reporters there would be a
news conference tomorrow about the talks. ''They are taking place in an
outspoken, constructive and excellent atmosphere,'' he said.
Mr Kohl is anxious to fulfil his promises to East German voters during
the election campaign to introduce its powerful currency and extend its
welfare system to East Germany.
The CDU heads the three-party Alliance for Germany which won 48% of
the vote in Sunday's elections and Mr de Maiziere is likely to become
Prime Minister.
Bonn expects the new East German Government to announce a
comprehensive legislative programme in its first statement of policy,
probably at the beginning of April.
The CDU package would include protection of private property and
investments and freedom to start new businesses as well as changes in
the tax system and trade union legislation, Government sources said.
CDU economic adviser Mr Gerd Koenig said that, if the laws all go
through on schedule, preparations for introducing the West German Mark
as legal tender in East Germany could start in May.
But the Alliance would need the backing of East Germany's Social
Democratic Party (SPD), which has rejected coalition overtures.
Mr Koenig said East Germany should announce soon that it would join
Bonn's Federal Republic under Article 23 of the West German constitution
and work out other details of unification later.
Meanwhile, East Germany's 400 newly-elected Parliamentarians may have
to be vetted for possible links with the hated former Stasi security
police.
''If we don't sort it out now we will have a repeat of what happened
in 1945 in West Germany with the survival of old Nazis in state
functions,'' said Baerbel Bohley, an opposition activist who helped to
overthrow the Stalinist regime last year.
Bishop Gottfried Forck, a member of the Government-backed body
supervising the Stasi's break-up, told reporters they had serious
indications that ex-informers were among the 400 people elected to
Parliament in Sunday's elections.
''To rule out such suspicions and guarantee the protection and
integrity of deputies we ask for your approval for an investigation of
your members,'' the panel wrote to the 13 parties in the new Parliament.
The row cast a long shadow over East Germany's young democracy. The
Stasi's huge archives, guarded by citizens' committees, are a time-bomb
containing potentially compromising information on many of the 16
million East Germans.
''Those Stasi files will break human lives for years,'' a Western
diplomat said.
Bishop Forck said the matter was so urgent that the parties should
agree by Friday that Church and party representatives should look into
Stasi files, overseen by state prosecutors.
Mr Rainer Eppelmann, who took over the Democratic Awakening party last
week after its leader Mr Wolfgang Schnur was exposed as a Stasi
informer, said up to 10% of deputies in the new Parliament had helped
the reviled security police.
A senior East German Social Democrat resigned today, three days after
being elected to Parliament, amid allegations that unnamed candidates in
his area had been Stasi informers.
Mr Wilfried Machalett, SPD leader in the southern Erfurt district,
told the local daily Thueringer Allgemeine he was quitting because he
was disgusted with politics and denied that he had ever worked for the
Stasi. -- Reuter.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article